FAT Q4 2024: Strong $150M Liquidity, 100+ Store Openings Pipeline
- Strong Liquidity Position: The Q&A highlights that FAT Brands maintains robust liquidity through about $150 million in available-for-sale securities and back-up funding via an ATM facility. This liquidity, along with an expected equity raise from Twin Peaks operations, supports both operational resilience and future growth initiatives.
- Robust Organic Growth Pipeline & Positive Brand Performance: Management emphasized a healthy pipeline with over 1,000 new store development agreements and expectations to exceed 100 new openings. Moreover, despite some brand challenges, certain segments like Round Table Pizza and the cookie/ice cream categories are showing positive same-store performance, underscoring potential upside in consumer demand.
- Focused Deleveraging and Value Unlocking Strategy: Executives reaffirmed a commitment to reducing debt—targeting a reduction of $75 million or more in 2025—and leveraging the Twin Peaks spin-off. This strategic focus on deleveraging and prioritizing high-value initiatives is aimed at unlocking additional shareholder value over time.
- Unresolved litigation risks: Ongoing legal matters remain uncertain, and while management is optimistic about resolving them in Q2, any delays or adverse outcomes could lead to additional cash outflows and increased legal expenses.
- Delays in store openings: Franchisee financing issues, construction delays, and lenders’ slow reactions have pushed some planned openings from 2024 into 2025, potentially impacting near-term revenue growth.
- Operational challenges with Smokey Bones: The conversion and impairment process for Smokey Bones, which resulted in an annual operating loss of about $2.6 million, illustrates the risks and costs associated with streamlining the portfolio that could continue to pressure profitability.
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Total Revenue | –13.5% (from $158.64M to $145.29M) | Total Revenue declined by 13.5% YoY. This decrease is largely driven by a contraction in the domestic market, seen in the nearly 10% drop in U.S. revenue, alongside lower royalty and advertising fee collections compared to the prior period vs.. |
Restaurant Sales | –9% (from $111.07M to $100.95M) | Restaurant Sales dropped by approximately 9% YoY. The decline reflects lower same-store performance and reduced customer activity domestically, contrasting with previous periods when new restaurant openings helped boost sales vs.. |
Royalties | –10% (from $24.87M to $22.33M) | Royalties fell by about 10% YoY. The reduction mirrors a weakness in domestic franchise operations, contributing to lower collections relative to the previously stronger performance vs.. |
Advertising Fees | –5.5% (from $10.51M to $9.93M) | Advertising Fees decreased by 5.5% YoY. This suggests a reduction in advertising expense or a scale-back in promotional activities, likely as a response to lower overall restaurant performance vs.. |
Franchise Fees | +39% (from $0.94M to $1.31M) | Franchise Fees increased by 39% YoY. This improvement is driven by successful franchising initiatives—possibly more new franchise openings or revised fee structures—that built on the prior period’s efforts despite being a smaller revenue component vs.. |
United States Revenue | –10% (from $155.4M to $139.8M) | U.S. Revenue dropped by roughly 10% YoY. The decline indicates a significant contraction in domestic operations, reinforcing the challenges in the home market that contributed to the overall revenue shortfall this period vs.. |
Revenue from Other Countries | +72% (from $3.2M to $5.5M) | International revenue surged by 72% YoY. This sharp increase reflects aggressive or successful expansion into non-U.S. markets, clearly outperforming the domestic trend, and indicating that growth abroad is starting to offset domestic declines vs.. |
Operating Loss | Worsened from –$3.14M to –$39.30M (1,120% change) | Operating Loss dramatically widened by over 1,100% YoY. The massive deterioration is primarily due to a steep rise in costs and expenses—such as cost of goods sold, general operating expenses, and integration costs—outpacing the modest revenue base, in contrast to the much tighter control in the previous period vs.. |
Net Loss | Expanded by approximately 157% (from –$26.24M to –$67.42M) | Net Loss increased by 157% YoY. The larger net loss resulted from the combination of the worsened operating loss, increased interest expenses, and other non-operating costs, building on a relatively smaller loss in the prior period vs.. |
Interest Expense | Increased from $28.93M to $30.26M | Interest Expense saw a modest increase YoY. The rise is primarily tied to new debt issuances used for financing strategic initiatives or acquisitions, representing a continued debt burden relative to the previous period vs.. |
Total Assets | Slight increase (from $1.2756B to $1.289B) | Total Assets grew modestly YoY. The slight increase suggests incremental capital investments or asset acquisitions, which were not enough to drive substantial growth compared to the relatively flat performance previously vs.. |
Total Liabilities | +15% (from $1.5043B to $1.7449B) | Total Liabilities surged by about 15% YoY. This increase is largely due to additional debt and other financial obligations undertaken—perhaps driven by acquisitions or operational financing—which contrasts with the lower liabilities in the prior period vs.. |
Stockholders’ Deficit | More than doubled (from –$228.72M to –$455.71M) | Stockholders’ Deficit more than doubled YoY. The significant deterioration is driven by sustained net losses and increased liabilities, which have overwhelmed equity, reversing some gains from previous stock issuances and share-based compensation vs.. |
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | Improved modestly (from –$12.57M to –$10.41M) | Net Cash Used in Operating Activities improved slightly YoY. The modest reduction in cash outflow suggests some better working capital management, though operating cash flow remains negative, continuing the trend seen in the previous period vs.. |
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit Openings (Organic Growth) | FY 2025 | Over 100 new units | Over 100 new locations in 2025 | no change |
Development Pipeline | FY 2025 | Approximately $50 million to $60 million in incremental annual adjusted EBITDA | Approximately $50 million in incremental annual adjusted EBITDA | lowered |
Factory Utilization | FY 2025 | Operating at 40%–45% capacity | Increase utilization to 60%–70% | raised |
Spin-off of Twin Hospitality Group | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Completion of the spin‐off | no prior guidance |
Debt Reduction Commitment | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Reduce debt by $75 million in 2025, including a minimum of $25 million by late April | no prior guidance |
International Expansion | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Over 40 locations in Brazil and nearly 25 in Mexico | no prior guidance |
Co‐branding Strategy | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Focus on opening several more co‐branded locations in 2025 | no prior guidance |
Deleveraging Focus | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Primary focus on deleveraging the balance sheet while executing organic growth opportunities | no prior guidance |
Litigation Resolution | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Hopeful resolution of ongoing litigation during the year | no prior guidance |
Liquidity Management | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Maintenance of a bond portfolio worth approximately $150 million and plans to raise equity at the Twin Peaks level | no prior guidance |
Conversion of Smokey Bones Locations | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Plan to convert approximately 30 of the 58 Smokey Bones locations into Twin Peaks lodges by 2026 | no prior guidance |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Liquidity and Funding Strength | In Q3, the discussion focused on debt-related refinancing and measures to manage cash flow. Q2 had no detailed mention. | Q4 emphasized maintaining $150 million in available-for-sale securities, an ATM program, and plans to raise Twin Peaks equity. | Consistent focus; while earlier periods stressed refinancing efforts, Q4 underscores liquidity availability and confidence in market conditions. |
Organic Growth and New Store Pipeline | Q2 and Q3 both highlighted strong new store openings and an extensive development pipeline with aggressive unit numbers. | Q4 reported opening 92 new restaurants and a robust pipeline supporting co-branding initiatives. | Sustained and robust, with the emphasis remaining on organic expansion, while Q4 added more detail on co-branding and multi-brand models. |
Brand Conversion Strategy | Q2 detailed early conversion processes with cost investments and Q3 emphasized accelerated conversions with noted cost challenges. | Q4 continued conversion of Smokey Bones into Twin Peaks, but with heightened concerns over lease negotiations and location suitability. | Recurring focus with increased execution risk; while the strategy remains central, Q4 highlights more complications compared to earlier periods. |
Debt Management, Refinancing, and Deleveraging | Q2 and Q3 focused on Twin Peaks debt refinancing, securitization adjustments, and reducing leverage. | Q4 expanded the discussion to include Twin Hospitality debt reduction, refinancing into long-term fixed-rate notes, and optimizing manufacturing capacity. | Continuously prioritized; the approach has evolved into deeper balance sheet restructuring in Q4, reflecting more detailed and proactive deleveraging efforts. |
Operational Performance and Margin/Expense Pressure | Q2 reported strong revenue growth with rising expenses due to acquisitions , and Q3 showed increased revenue with pressure from integration costs. | Q4 revealed a decline in revenue and a larger net loss along with increased general expenses and impairment charges. | Worsening performance; while earlier periods had growth with pressure, Q4 shows a negative swing in margins and operational performance. |
Legal Risks and Litigation Uncertainty | Q2 briefly mentioned ongoing legal expenses with an expectation of resolution within 12–18 months ; Q3 detailed legal expenses impacting cash flow and a hope for resolution in about 12 months. | Q4 expressed optimism that most litigation will be resolved during 2025 along with potential insurance recoveries, though uncertainty remains. | Persistent but cautiously optimistic; legal risks remain but there is an expectation of resolution soon, consistent from Q3 to Q4. |
Attractive M&A and Acquisition Prospects | Q2 noted increased deal flow with attractive multiples and strategic acquisitions aimed at deleveraging. Q3 focused on selective, high-performing targets while avoiding turnaround situations. | Q4 reaffirmed a strategic, synergistic acquisition approach while emphasizing current high capital costs and a preference for organic growth. | Steadily cautious; the acquisition strategy is consistently selective, with Q4 reflecting more caution due to high borrowing costs and a focus on reducing leverage. |
-
Liquidity Update
Q: What's your current liquidity position?
A: Management confirmed a strong liquidity profile with $150 million in available-for-sale securities and active ATM facilities, along with plans for an equity raise for Twin Peaks to support operations. -
M&A Strategy
Q: What progress on M&A opportunities?
A: They are selectively pursuing strategic acquisitions that complement the portfolio while focusing on deleveraging rather than aggressively expanding leverage. -
Smokey Bones Conversion
Q: When will Smokey Bones conversions complete?
A: The majority of conversions are expected to be decided and implemented over the next 24 months, targeting around 30 locations for transformation. -
Operating Loss Impact
Q: How did closures affect earnings?
A: The closures resulted in an operating loss of roughly $2.6 million for the full year, reflecting the challenges from store performance. -
Litigation Costs
Q: How will litigation costs evolve?
A: Management is hopeful that ongoing legal matters will largely resolve within the year, with potential settlements by Q2 to curtail further expenses. -
Restaurant Openings Delay
Q: Why fewer restaurants than forecasted?
A: Slight delays, attributed to franchisee financing and construction hold-ups, have pushed some openings into next year, though the robust pipeline should yield over 100 new restaurants. -
Consumer Spending Impact
Q: Which brands are most affected by consumer trends?
A: While price-sensitive brands like Fazoli’s experienced softer same-store sales, others such as Round Table Pizza and dessert units showed positive performance amid mixed consumer spending. -
Other Brand Spin-Offs
Q: Will other brands be spun off similarly?
A: Management clarified that additional spin-offs are not planned, emphasizing their focus on the Twin Peaks model and manufacturing opportunities instead.
Research analysts covering Fat Brands.